Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 17-24, January 2006

Acceptance tests of diagnostic displays in a PACS system according to AAPM TG18

  • Andrea Cresp

      Affiliations

    • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Monza (Italy)
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: A Crespi, Azieda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Servizio di Fisica Sanitaria, via Pergolesi 33, 20052 Monza. Tel: 039-2333685; Fax: 039-2332524
  • ,
  • Francesco Bonsignore

      Affiliations

    • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Monza (Italy)
    • Scuola di Specializzazione in Fisica Sanitaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano (Italy)
  • ,
  • Nicoletta Paruccini

      Affiliations

    • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Monza (Italy)
  • ,
  • Elena De Ponti

      Affiliations

    • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Monza (Italy)
  • ,
  • Isabella Macchi

      Affiliations

    • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, U.O. di Radiodiagnostica, Monza (Italy)

Received 19 September 2005; received in revised form 23 December 2005; accepted 8 February 2006.

Abstract 

In a filmless environment it is necessary to execute acceptance and constancy tests on monitors used for interpretation of medical images. Performances of Barco CRT MGD521 MKII, Barco LCD L685EX monitors have been evaluated. Acceptancepress were executed following AAPM Task Group 18 guidelines. Visual and instrumental evaluations of geometric distortions, reflections, luminances response, contrast, uniformity, resolution, angular response and veiling glare were made. Barco monitors showed optimal performances, while EIZO monitors were accepted with some reserve on their quality level.

Finally a comparative evaluation between monitors and film (the actual gold standard) was performed by an interview of ten radiologists: the monitors showed a quality at least equal to film. These monitors are currently in use for routine medical interpretation.

AAPM TG18, Display device, Calibration, PACS

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1120-1797(06)80006-2

doi:10.1016/S1120-1797(06)80006-2

Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 17-24, January 2006