Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 21 , Pages 4-6 , 2006

Mainstream breast cancer radiology perspective

    M. D.
  • Debra M. Ikeda

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Debra M. Ikeda, M. D. Stanford Advanced Medicine Center 874 Blake Wilbur Drive, Room 2234, Stanford, California 94305-5826 USA.

References 

  1. Balu-Maestro C, et al. Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;72(2):145–152
  2. Sickles EA. Breast imaging: from 1965 to the present. Radiology. 2000;215(1):1–16
  3. Warren Burhenne LJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology. 2000;215(2):554–562
  4. Mendelson EB. Problem-solving ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(5):909–918Mendelson EB. Problem-solving ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(5):vii
  5. Liberman L, et al. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology. 1998;208(3):717–723
  6. Cody HS, et al. Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(1):13–19
  7. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(4):661–663
  8. Ikeda DM, Sickles EA. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast. Radiology. 1988;168(3):651–656
  9. Sickles EA, et al. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147(6):1149–1153
  10. Sickles EA. Combining spot-compression and other special views to maximize mammographic information. Radiology. 1989;173(2):571
  11. Sickles EA. Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: tailoring the examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(1):31–39
  12. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(1):27–43
  13. Smith RA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(3):141–169
  14. Tabar L, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(4):625–651
  15. (ACR). A.C. o.R., ACR BI-RADS—Mammography. 4th Edition. In ACR Breast imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. 2003, Reston, VA.
  16. Foxcroft LM, et al. Breast cancers invisible on mammogrpahy. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70(3):162–167
  17. Ikeda DM, et al. Interval carcinomas in the Malmo Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159(2):287–294
  18. Elmore JG, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(16):1089–1096
  19. Currence BV, et al. Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have large psychosocial effects?. Acad Radiol. 2003;10(11):1257–1266
  20. Bobo JK, et al. Factors that may discourage annual mammography among low-income women with access to free mammograms: a study using multi-ethnic, multiracial focus groups. Psychol Rep. 1999;85(2):405–416
  21. Bakker DA, et al. The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998;25(1):115–121
  22. Katz A, et al. Locoregional recurrence patterns after mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: implications for postoperative irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(15):2817–2827
  23. Holland R, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–990
  24. Ikeda DM, Andersson I. Atypical mammographic presentations of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 1989;172:661–666
  25. Chen SC, et al. Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(909):600–604
  26. discussion 280–1 Moon WK, et al. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 2002;22(2):269–280
  27. Berg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(5):1225–1228
  28. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK. Whole-breast US imaging: four-year follow-up. Radiology. 1985;157(2):505–507
  29. Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW. Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(5):843–845
  30. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225(1):165–175
  31. Gordon PB. Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(3):431–441
  32. Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(5):845–851Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(5):vi
  33. Lee CH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology. 1997;202(3):849–854
  34. Debnam JWE, de Sevilla , Staple TW. Preoperative localization of occult breast lesions: a new technic. South Med J. 1977;70(2):204Debnam JWE, de Sevilla , Staple TW. Preoperative localization of occult breast lesions: a new technic. South Med J. 1977;70(2):235
  35. Rebner M, et al. Two-view specimen radiography in surgical biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(2):283–285
  36. Favret AM, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: is surgery necessary. Breast J. 2001;7(2):131–137
  37. Dash N, et al. Usefulness of tissue marker clips in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(4):911–917

PII: S1120-1797(06)80013-X

doi: 10.1016/S1120-1797(06)80013-X

Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 21 , Pages 4-6 , 2006

Article Tools