Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 24, Issue 4 , Pages 175-181, December 2008

Wall shear stress calculation in ascending aorta using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Investigating effective ways to calculate it in clinical practice

  • Efstathios P. Efstathopoulos

      Affiliations

    • 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12464 Athens, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Georgios Patatoukas

      Affiliations

    • 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12464 Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Ioannis Pantos

      Affiliations

    • 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12464 Athens, Greece
    • Department of Cardiology, Athens Euroclinic, 9 Athanassiadou Street, 11521 Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Odysseas Benekos

      Affiliations

    • 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12464 Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Demosthenes Katritsis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Athens Euroclinic, 9 Athanassiadou Street, 11521 Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Nikolaos L. Kelekis

      Affiliations

    • 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12464 Athens, Greece

Received 12 August 2007; received in revised form 17 December 2007; accepted 9 January 2008. published online 20 February 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

There is growing evidence that atherosclerosis, as well as endothelial biology, depend on arterial wall shear stress (WSS). Several methods of WSS calculation with varying degrees of complexity have been proposed. This study aimed at investigating whether the most straightforward and easier to apply of these methods give comparable results in clinical practice.

Methods

Complete velocity encoding measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging were performed in 20 patients at a level perpendicular to the long axis of the ascending aorta approximately 2cm above the aortic valve. WSS was calculated at this location on maximum systole. MR imaging was accomplished on a 1.5T scanner. Four methods were applied to calculate WSS; three of them are based on the predictions of Poiseuille's theory of flow, while the last one is based on calculations resulting by the application of the definition of WSS.

Results

WSS calculated with the above mentioned methods was found to be in the range 4.2±1.8 to 3.5±1.7dynes/m2. The velocity profile at the site of measurements can be described with a parabolic equation of the form with an average r2=0.83, which is in good agreement with Poiseuille's theory of flow. Comparison of the results shows no statistically significant differences between WSS measurements calculated with these methods.

Discussion

The four methods are equivalent in calculating WSS at the ascending aorta when blood flow velocities have a good parabolic distribution.

Keywords: Phase contrast MRI, Shear stress

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1120-1797(08)00025-2

doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.01.004

Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 24, Issue 4 , Pages 175-181, December 2008