Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 161-165 , December 2009

The European federation of organisations for medical physics policy statement No. 13: Recommended guidelines on the development of safety and quality management systems for medical physics departments

Received 12 October 2008 ,Accepted 13 November 2008.

References 

  1. Eurohealth, Mythbusters, myth: we can eliminate errors in health care by getting rid of ‘bad apples’. Eurohealth. 2006;12(2):29–30Available from: www.chsrf.ca/mythbusters/pdf/myth15_e.pdf
  2. Gillin M. Institute of Medicine Report on medical errors. AAPM Newsletter. March/April 2000;
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) . Lessons learned from accidental exposures in radiotherapy 2000. Safety Reports Series No. 17 Vienna: IAEA; 2000;
  4. International Commission on Radiological Protection . Prevention of accidental exposures to patients undergoing radiotherapy. Publication 86 Exeter: Pergamon Press; 2001;
  5. EFOMP policy statement No 6: “recommended guidelines on national registration schemes for medical physicists”. Physica Medica. 1995;XI(4):157–159
  6. EFOMP policy statement No 8: “continuing professional development for the medical physicist.”. Physica Medica. 1998;XIV(2):81–83
  7. EFOMP policy statement No 10: “recommended guidelines on national schemes for continuing professional development of medical physicists”. Physica Medica. 2001;XVII:97–101www.efomp.org
  8. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson WF, Leibel S, Morton RJ, et al. Report of AAPM TG 40, Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology. Medical Physics. 1994;21:581–618
  9. Thwaites DI, Scalliet P, Leer JW, Overgaard J. Quality assurance in radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1995;35:61–73
  10. Leer JW, McKenzie A, Scalliet P, Thwaites DI. Practical guidelines for the implementation of a quality system in radiotherapy. ESTRO Physics for Clinical Radiotherapy booklet no. 4 Brussels: ESTRO; 1998;
  11. International Atomic Energy Agency, Standardized quality audit procedures for on-site dosimetry review visits to radiotherapy hospitals, Izewska J. et al., SSDL Newsletter No.46, Vienna (2002).
  12. World Health Organisation . Quality assurance in radiology. Geneva: WHO; 1982;
  13. British Institute of Radiology . Assurance of quality in the diagnostic X-ray department. London: BIR Publ.; 1988;
  14. BIR Report 18: technical and physical parameters for quality assurance in medical diagnostic radiology. London: BIR Publ.; 1989;
  15. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP), Report 99: quality assurance for diagnostic radiology. Bethesda: NCRP Publ.; 1988;
  16. European Commission . European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Report EUR 14821 3rd ed.. 2001;Luxembourg
  17. Busch HP, Jaschke W. Adaptation of the quality criteria concept to digital radiography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1998;1–3:61–63
  18. Busch HP. Dose and quality management in digital radiography. Fortschritte Roentgenstrahlen. 2003;175:17–19
  19. Selection and use of ISO 9000. Available from: http://www.iso.ch

 Disclaimer Note: EFOMP Policy statement No.13 has been approved by EFOMP Council in Krakow (Poland) on 20 September, 2008. Hence this paper has not been subjected to standard peer review, being an official policy statement of the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

PII: S1120-1797(08)00099-9

doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.11.002

Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 161-165 , December 2009