Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 207-211 , December 2009

Durability of imaging plates in clinical use

Received 27 August 2008 ,Revised 24 November 2008 ,Accepted 10 January 2009.

References 

  1. Neitzel U. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1–3):32–38
  2. Report of AAPM Task Group 10 . Acceptance testing and quality control of photostimulable storage phosphor imaging systems. Available from: http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/ISBN 97818883406482006;
  3. Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Mawdsley GE, Hunter DM, Beideck DJ. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system. Med Phys. 2006;33(8):2998–3005
  4. Akdeniz BG, Gröndahl HG. Degradation of storage phosphor images due to scanning delay. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(2):74–77
  5. Hammerstrom H, Aldrich J, Alves L, Ho A. Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts. J Digit Imaging. 2006;19(3):226–239
  6. Volpe JP, Storto ML, Andriole KP, Gamsu G. Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third-generation computed radiography system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(3):653–657
  7. Solomon SL, Jost RG, Glazer HS, Sagel SS, Anderson DJ, Molina PL. Artifacts in computed radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(1):181–185
  8. Oestmann JW, Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Galanski M. Hardware and software artifacts in storage phosphor radiography. Radiographics. 1991;11(5):795–805
  9. Cesar LJ, Schueler BA, Zink FE, Daly TR, Taubel JP, Jorgenson LL. Artefacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(878):195–202
  10. Report 06033 . KCARE computed radiography (CR) systems for general radiography. A Comparative Report Edition 3. Available from: http://www.kcare.co.uk/index.htmJune 2006;
  11. European Commission Radiation Protection 91 . Criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/091_en.htm1999;
  12. Freitas P, Yaedu RY, Rubira-Bullen IR, Escarpinati M, Vieira MC, Schiabel H, et al. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(3):207–213
  13. Fauber TL, Legg JS, Quinn M. Variation in CR imaging plate readers. Radiol Technol. 2002;74(1):15–23
  14. Schaetzing R. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Agfa computed radiography. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(Suppl. 3):S207–S214
  15. Mazzocchi S, Belli G, Busoni S, Gori C, Menchi I, Salucci P, et al. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1–3):169–173
  16. Charnock P, Connolly PA, Hughes D, Moores BM. Evaluation and testing of computed radiography systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1–3):201–207

PII: S1120-1797(09)00002-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.01.001

Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 207-211 , December 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution