Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 71-79, April 2010
Possibility of limiting the un-justified irradiation in 131I therapy of Graves' disease: A thyroid mass-reduction based method for the optimum activity calculation
Abstract
Objective
In Graves' disease therapy, the amount of 131I is usually decided following two different modalities: the administration of a fixed activity or of an activity individually calculated based on a fixed value of target absorbed dose. Although the effectiveness of each of these approaches is good (about 80% of patients cured), the ALARA principle must be applied avoiding the un-justified radioactivity to the patient himself, the people living/working near him and the environment. In this paper a new approach to the 131I therapy in Graves' disease, based on the optimum value of the final thyroid mass, is presented.
Design
97 Graves' disease patients (29 males) were randomly assigned into three groups (GR1, GR2, GR3). In two of them (GR1, GR3) the radioiodine administering activity was calculated based on two fixed thyroid absorbed dose values (100
Gy for GR1; 400
Gy for GR3), in GR2 it was calculated based on the desired final optimum thyroid mass value mf
=
0.24
m0/U0
Results
The rate of cured patients are 48% (GR1), 97% (GR2) (z-test, p
<
0.001) and 97% (GR3). The average activity administered to GR2 (393
±
157
MBq) is lower than that administrered to GR3 patients (524
±
201
MBq) (p
=
0.007, two-tails unpaired t-test); the thyroid absorbed dose in GR2 (262
±
78
Gy) is lower than in GR3 patients (407
±
23
Gy) (p
<
0.001, two-tails unpaired t-test).
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that the thyroid-mass based approach optimizes the treatment avoiding an un-justified excess or a not-effective too low activity without time and resources consuming.
Keywords: Radioimmunotherapy, Thyroid, 131I, Internal dosimetry, Graves' disease
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1120-1797(09)00051-9
doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.08.003
© 2009 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 71-79, April 2010
