Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 52-57, January 2011
Physical characterization and comparison of two commercially available micro-MLCs
Abstract
In this study, the physical characteristics (penumbra width variation with the source size and shape, interleaf leakage, transmission through the leaves, and the tongue-and-groove effect) of two linear accelerators (BrainLAB's Novalis and Elekta's Synergy-S Beam Modulator) have been investigated. For similar square fields (about 4.5
cm
×
4.5
cm) with source-to-surface/skin-distance (SSD) ranging from 90
cm to 115
cm and measurements taken at the depth of Dmax
=
1.5
cm for 6
MV photon beam. The Novalis MLC has penumbra width of 2.4
±
0.11
mm–2.8
±
0.11
mm at the leaf-end and 2.2
±
0.1
mm–2.7
±
0.1
mm on the leaf-side; and those for the Synergy-S MLC are 4.4
±
0.17
mm–5.2
±
0.2
mm and 3.0
±
0.12
mm–3.5
±
0.12
mm. Upon rotating the Synergy-S collimator by 90° (i.e., shifting the leaf movement to the gun–target direction), significant reduction of the leaf-end penumbra width (17%) and increase of leaf-side penumbra width (28%) suggest an elliptical shape of the radiation source spot. Similar rotation of the collimator yielded reduction of the penumbras on both leaf-end (34%) and leaf-side (28%) for Novalis, indicating that the Novalis has a more symmetric source size. For all the field sizes and settings, BrainLAB's Novalis μMLC produce a smaller penumbra for simple square fields compared to the Elekta's Synergy-S. However, this difference became less pronounced for leaf-side penumbra and also for circular fields. The tongue-and-groove effect of the Novalis (23
±
0.9%) is slightly smaller than that of the Synergy-S (25
±
1%); while the interleaf leakage and leakage directly through leaves for Synergy-S (1.6
±
0.07% & 0.9
±
0.04%) are lower than that of Novalis (2
±
0.08% & 1.3
±
0.05%).
Keywords: Micromulti-leaf collimator, Penumbra, Interleaf leakage, Tongue-and-groove effect, Focal spot, IMRT
PII: S1120-1797(10)00007-4
doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.01.005
© 2010 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 52-57, January 2011
